Three competing visions for what Divinux is.
Each option below represents a fundamentally different commitment about the AI SRE. They differ on the deepest axis — what is the AI's role and what is the human's role? Same payments-deploy-regression scenario plays out in each, on a 3-minute loop. Click in, watch the loop, then come back to compare.
Every signal visible at once. AI agents as specialist panels you direct. The human is the pilot in the cockpit; the AI is the co-pilot.
Linear-meets-Superhuman for ops. Incidents live in stable lanes (Triage / Investigating / Mitigating / Watching / Resolved). Nothing scrolls into the void; the lifecycle IS the spine.
Every incident, runbook, and postmortem is a file you open as a tab. The center is a long-form document the AI co-authors with you, section by section.
For each: imagine an actual incident at 2am. Which one do you want to be looking at? Which one do you want a non-engineer (CEO, finance, support lead) to be able to follow along on? Which one would a competitor copy first?
These are not mutually exclusive forever — one wins as the "default," but elements of the others can graduate in. The pick here is about what we build first.